Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kurt A. Altmann who wrote (3726)	5/8/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Christiaan McDonald	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Kurt, neither CCUR nor SEAC said anything about them being set up different, at least we didn't hear them say anything. We were in and out all day. I don't know why they would have been set up different. I find it difficult to believe that SFA would approve a deceptive set up. I have worked with SFA before on projects and they are known in the industry as a "straight arrow". It doesn't make any sense to me for SFA to sign a marketing and development agreement with SEAC and then a couple of weeks later allow CCUR to obtain an unfair advantage in set up. Does that make any sense to anyone??? In any event, this is just one demo and not the end of the world for SEAC. If they just had bad luck, then they will have plenty of opportunities for better results later. Everyone has had things go bad and its not a good feeling. By the way, SFA's set top was used by both so SFA had to be totally involved in both systems being set up. Ken