SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (32550)5/8/1998 11:06:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572507
 
Paul,

Investor A was making the point that the PII-300 runs hot, and isn't a good buy at all. You raise an excellent point--it's last year's technology. I guess Investor A is right--why buy last year's .35u technology when you can buy this years .25u K6-300, which runs cooler, for less?

Of course, Intel does have this year's technology. The 0.25 micron Pentium II at 333 Mhz dissipates 23 watts including L2 cache. But how much of the 23 watts is accounted for by the cache? My conclusion is that the 15 watt dissipation of the K6 is nothing to get excited about--it's certainly not a lot in comparison to Intel's .25u products. So why were you so worked up over it?

Kevin



To: Paul Engel who wrote (32550)5/11/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572507
 
RE:<Pentium II 333 MHz dissipates 23 watts>

So what, the K6-300 according to you dissipates 15 watts. L2 cache for K6-300 is insignificant in power dissipation, certainly less than 2 watts.

Petz