Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (1938)	5/9/1998 2:25:00 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 7491

"Did you catch the word alpha? Since then the words beta version, evaluation version, and final version have been mentioned." Ah, words mentioned .... a nice start. Now how about the freakin product? "Could it just possibly be that they have been improving it?" Well, I dunno, and I doubt Bill does .... how about you or Rhonda tell us? Or better yet, show us. Tell TED the password and login .... so easy

To: John Chapman who wrote (1938)	5/9/1998 2:54:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

Yes John, I did catch the word alpha. Not surprisingly, you're either wildly incorrect or being completely dishonest&#151let's replay. &#147There are posts on Yahoo, such as mine, that could not get the alpha to unzip completely and there are others that said it worked fine. Did you catch the word alpha? Since then the words beta version, evaluation version, and final version have been mentioned.&#148 &#147I could launch the Y2K software fine. It just crapped after hitting the "Analyzer" button.&#148 messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com &#147I ran it and it crashed just like the a version I downloaded a few weeks ago.&#148 messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com &#147I haven't played with it a lot yet, but it did search thru all the files on my hard drive and generated a report on what it found.&#148 messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com All the time, you were there. You were asking for the software, too&#151you saw the posts, surely you must remember, or were you just bored with shilling "moonshot...off to the moon". Nobody mentions alpha, not even you&#151that's because it wasn't. Besides, when has a company ever released an alpha version to the public? It's too easy to pick apart&#151alphas are, by and large, internal releases. The only thing you sort of got right is that alpha is an important distinction in development stages. Here's the kicker: At best, all of the above outstanding recommendations were from the same version that internet-fx tested (ran perfect according to their qualified analysis). At worst, internet-fx had an earlier version than everybody else. Makes sense as the press release came out the same day as most of the above outstanding recommendations&#151they had to have been testing it previously. But wait&#151internet-fx was using a beta copy (before the public received an alpha&#151yeah right): biz.yahoo.com &#147 4) Each year 2000 non-compliant software application has an option for patching said software, though in the Beta version, it has not yet been implemented. Beta versions of the software can be located at&#133&#148 So yeah John, I've heard of alpha. Have a good round of golf. -MrB

To: John Chapman who wrote (1938)	5/9/1998 9:42:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 7491

Did you catch the word alpha? Since then the words beta version, evaluation version, and final version have been mentioned. Could it just possibly be that they have been improving it? Well, I expect taht at the very least they've been trying to get it to work. Silly them! What a waste of time! You, a qualified evaluator of software, have already told us that it doesn't MATTER if it works! I like Bill's idea about bulk-emailing the URL for MSFT. How much d'you think we could get for it per Unit?