To: Carl who wrote (8572 ) 5/9/1998 3:37:00 AM From: marcos Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
Yeah, I'm biased, no question. I do not like this Asensio. And sure, there's misinformation and hypey fluffy positive posts on this thread, we are after all just a bunch of jerks on the internet. Anyway, I've done my fair share of commenting on that already, thereby throwing one more jerk into the fray. But this greasy little New York cubano is another thing - he has power because he is worshipped as infallible, way too much power imho. He should lose some power, just like Bishop is losing his. All these little tin gods will come down in the end, their own bullshit will catch up with them. And this is the stock to bring Asensio down, imho."People should be able to back up their statements with proof. Anything else is mere conjecture. Opinions are fine, but they should be identified as such." I agree completely. Btw, everything I've ever posted on this thread was opinion. I do not lunch with Las Magistradas, do not date their daughters. I highly doubt that Asensio does either. So now let's turn that onus of proof on him. ... instead of Graystone, I mean -g- And yes, Graystone does get carried away in his enthusiasm. He doesn't like the cubano playing sleazy retrogressive venezolano politics, or capitalizing on them, any more than I do. And I called him on it when he got on Patrick's case, because I felt that Patrick had established his credentials way way back in the story, and had made good sense in the referring posts. But jeeeeze, what a picky semantical argument you picked on G's unfortunate use of the word 'create' - you will agree, will you not, that Asensio created a climate conducive to profiting by going short kry in those first days after his first big promotion? Did I mention that ascenso means 'promotion' en espa¤ol? ... cheers ... marcos