Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Genesis Media Group, Inc (GNNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: analizer who wrote (803)	5/9/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: Almost Blue	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3129

Any help on the questions would be great. Thanks, Dan

To: analizer who wrote (803)	5/9/1998 11:03:00 PM
From: BILL L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3129

hi, analizer, it is a good idea to have Don on line to know our shareholders in future. Only question i have is how it is done here. I am more leaning that we could first meet his PR on line (monitor the thread, and answer our questions time to time), to built up a communication channel. When Daniel meets him, he may be able to raise the live online conference up, and see his response. If positive, we can think of how to lay it out. JMHO

To: analizer who wrote (803)	5/10/1998 12:33:00 AM
From: Douglas V. Fant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3129

KC, great idea! Let's suggest that Mr. Logan set up some time to appear on the Thread and to have a discussion about GNNX, its present, its future. I also agree that I do not want Mr. Logan monitoring the Thread on a regular basis- I want him to be focused upon running the company! But a PR person, or lower echelon person could serve that function... Now! back to trading patterns. I noticed that once again ten minutes after the close a large block of shares, 17,500 shares to be exact, crossed the ticker @ $1.50/share. there were also two smaller trades or 200 shares each a few minutes after that @ $1.468/share. This is the third day in a row that a large block of GNNX has moved within a few minutes after the close- any idea what's going on here anybody, since these trades are not denoted "late trades" anyway.... Sincerely, Doug F.

To: analizer who wrote (803)	5/10/1998 5:19:00 PM
From: Charger	Respond to of 3129

I vote no. I have seen this backfire with disastrous results. If a company is strong, they will have no need to come to an internet meeting, and they should be too busy, imho. Despite the fact that good information is thrown out, there will always be flamethrowers, naysayers, professional stock tankers and those remarks and the flustered responses that might be issued while a person tries to maintain their justifiable anger is all being "logged", copied into other rooms, etc. Not only that, it is rare that I have seen a well-organized on-line chat. Some people feel no monitoring should be done, some people feel it should definitely be monitored. Most are total fiascos with a virtual impossibility to keep up with the number of questions being thrown out, not ony all at the same time, but the same question again and again as people arrive late. Even with a well run live on-line conference, words get misheard and twisted. Public telephone conferences seem to be better run but are eithe expensive for the company or expensive for those calling in. Even so, there is some little word that someone will take as a negative, and like political press conferences, people love to feed on the negative. Mind you, I am not against looking at the negative, I just hate general paranoia and in particular shorters and professional naysayers, even tho I know it is the nature of the internet beast and something I have to live with. Just my two cents. Charger