Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr Metals who wrote (32087)	5/9/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Mr. Metals, that is one point I disagree with you, I do not think that standard fire assays (by the way, there are no such "standards, they are all over the place) are the golden rule. Maybe they are the golden rule, but this is the only place in analytical chemistry where we still use alchemist's magic, they are antiquated, notoriously inaccurate and their readings belong in the Journal of Irreproducible Results" . But I would agree that there were ample opportunities to get out with minimal pains. I was on this thread myself on Black Friday preaching my old "if the TA and FA do not jive, follow the TA". On the other hand, from the point of view of the "supporters of the stock, I was bearish on it all the way from 4 to 8 on its way to 11 or so, missing a nice double bagger, so why should my subsequent calls be believed or trusted. Zeev