SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (32091)5/9/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: go4it  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
You understand incorrectly that the operations in Nevada are all locked in sulfides and they are not all treatable with HCN. That is not to say that the chemical or geological make-up at BRX is the same as those in Nevada because they are not. The minerals are however extractable as we have seen in COC results from across the board of companies working on a resolution. The largest problem that I have been able to figure out is repeatability and process.

The bottom line is that the metals have been extracted chemically with standard milling processes applied. Cost effective is what the issue is not necassarily efficiency and it will be done and I will be here to celebrate the success when it is accomplished.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (32091)5/9/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: Mr Metals  Respond to of 35569
 
I have a feeling a 10-1 reverse split is coming. If not, then Chapter 11. This might be there only chance to survive.

Mr Metals



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (32091)5/9/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: Mr Metals  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
CORRECTION: 1-10 Reverse I meant. My 15 minutes was up:-)

Mr Metals