Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (2008)	5/10/1998 7:09:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

Well, actually, I didn't request it. I was indeed looking for you just to see if you were really around (your honesty level isn't quite "par"). The ICQ interface was designed so that if you have a name highlighted and click the "Next" button, it automatically sends the request. Nevermind that there's no indication of what an action will lead to&#151typical Wintel programming. Mac programmers are very adamant about letting one know what will happen. So no, I didn't request to be added per se&#151the programmer did that for me. As a result, I'm not particularly heartbroken at your rejection. That's a pretty minor issue in the big picture, though. The bigger picture is that this "us" which you seem to conceptualize as an entity, still has never received any answers. Funny, there's folks who cry moonshot and there's folks who ask questions. The questions don't get answered and the cheerleaders are more interested in hassling this "us" rather than learning about their own company. Of course, the company can't seem to provide any answers either. Those questions would include determining the level of Mark Shultz in this issue, how much he got paid (in cash or shares), the level of involvement of certain shills hyping the issue, and the connections between the promoter, the development company, the stock promoter, and the rather unqualified testing firm. For those who feel strongly about preserving the integrity of the Y2K industry from the blemishes of crooks who attempt to cash in the current trend&#151and for those who feel strongly about the stock market as a whole&#151that it should have its integrity preserved, here's a useful form. At least, I've certainly found it handy: sec.gov (I love the name, too&#151"con-form"&#151very fitting.)