Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIS: WHAT IS GOING ON? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael T Currie who wrote (1780)	5/10/1998 7:56:00 AM
From: Pakman2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6931

Chaz in certain instances you might have a point. There have certainly been companies in the past that have lied in order to elevate share prices but there is no evidence that this is happening with TSIS. AT & T put out their own news release regarding the network support that was provided to them by TSIS. So unless T is lying to themselves you are incorrect about your statments regarding TSIS!

To: Michael T Currie who wrote (1780)	5/10/1998 8:25:00 AM
From: chaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6931

Mike, may I suggest you turn it around and start demanding that the hype to which I am hoping to help you recognize be eliminated. The risk in BB stocks? Mike, the real risk is in not being invested. We, all of us, need to save our money, invest it, and make it grow. The danger is our own impatience....not the market. That's why people are drawn to the quick-kill BB... And in most cases, it's a sucker hole, rife with exactly what I'm trying to warn about. If I scare a few people into thinking clearly, watching their bucks and learning to be respectful of how hard it was to save those first few investment dollars, where's the harm? I'll bet there are plenty of people reading this and other threads who have no idea just how risky the BB issues are. Maybe you know the risks, but for those companies whose contracts are approaching a year in force, you still don't know squat about that revenue. I hope that bothers you right down in your nickkers. It sure ought to!

To: Michael T Currie who wrote (1780)	5/10/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: BarbaraT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6931

By the way folks ... there is a poster (new TSIS friend) who posts on AOL threads. He is an employee of Lucent and became aware of TSIS as a result of the contract with Lucent and AT&T. So, the contracts do exist. I know all about John Sculley and Spectrum, and that was a scam but it is so different it's a joke. When the press release came out about their contracts, the alleged contracted companies put out denials and thus, they were exposed. Where are all the denials. AT&T, US Post Office, Ascend, Seagate, Lucent, etc. ... announcements have been out for a looong time and no denials. Meanwhile, the news is out over the wires and if, in fact, no contracts were in existence --- well, the companies in question would have long since put out denials. I would assume that Chaz, although in denial, is one of the shorters who is now starting to panic. Too many things are coming together for this company and he needs to cover his "short". Unfortunately, there are many people who are normally momentum players that have come into this one and have decided to hold for the long term. I say unfortunate because momentum players can be frightened off easily since they are used to taking quick gains. Don't let this man scare you ... if he knows that this is a scam, where is his proof. I think the proof is in the pudding, so to speak, wherein there have been no denials whatsoever of any news that has gone out. Ever!! By the way, and the most important thing to consider, why would someone ... anyone ... spend so much time and energy on something in which he has no interest whatsoever. My goodness ... such a good hearted soul who spends his valuable time trying to help his fellow man (I think not). This man has his own agenda here. My time is valuable. I am very long this stock and that is why I post here. I read the threads to learn of new ideas and keep informed on old ones. I have certainly done my DD on this one and know that this man speaks with forked tongue. I am not alone ... John Baker, Bill Gavlick, and more that post here have been to the offices, read all the information, met all the people, know what is going on. I welcome all posts, pro and con, and have said in the past I welcome Chaz' posts as long as he can support what he has said. But he has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.