Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1820)	5/10/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: Daniel Miller	Respond to of 9440

They did it at .07 but since they were merging with a decent size company such as I have heard Santi, they didn't need to make such a big split.

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1820)	5/10/1998 10:57:00 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

Reverse splits do not cause a short cover. Now it is is an individual that is one thing but a MM there is only two ways to mkae them cover I have learned. 1.) Buying steady buying keeping the price on a good even plane and thus causing the short (MM or Individual) to get tired of the negative balance and then cover. MMs will cover when their capital marketizations are affected and it starts affecting their MM status. 2.) Calling for certificates then only the few that don't call are the ones that capitalize. Now other than that I do not know of a way. You can force out individuals but Professional I doubt it. GB