Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Genesis Media Group, Inc (GNNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boob who wrote (828)	5/10/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: BILL L	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3129

Thanx, Boob. Let us be cautious about getting PR and CEO on line at this moment. There are some positive sides of it, but negative impact (as boob pointed) may cause troubles in long-term investment. One thing, we can think of, is that if "professional" naysayers ( i mean those get paid by MMs) come over to bug them from time to time, it will also be very unpleasant to us too. We do can ask GNNX to read SI once a while, and understand what we are concerned about, and respond it in a proper way. like press release about open door policy, audited financial report, and more contract..etc. Daniel' visit bring us a lot of information. Big thanx again. Even though we may have different opinions on many issues, i am glad to see that GNNX has gained so many firm supporters. let us be good team players watching GNNX to fly in future. Go GNNX

To: Boob who wrote (828)	5/10/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3129

Boob, you're probably right: <<If he posts once, he is here for life...no one will let him leave, they'll just keep bugging him with more questions, and if he finally decides to leave because it is taking too much of his time answering questions than everyone will say bad things about him, how dare he leave us here, etc, etc. It's a LOSE LOSE situation for any CEO that posts on line. PR firms I don't trust, I have been burned by them many times before..."straight from the horses' mouth or not at all" is my mottos.>> We/They may want to consider taking a page out PNLK's book. Both companies are poised to move forward, either by way of a watershed product intro ( as in PNLK's case ) or an historic jump in earnings ( as in GNNX's case ) one or 2 Q's from here, based on recent contact announcements. For about 2 weeks now, a principal from PNLK's marketing firm ( as opposed to a PR firm--a distinction with a decided difference ) has been answering some of the questions/concerns posed by some of the threadsters on the PNLK board. His answers have been factual, concise and wisely infrequent. Moreover, he has smartly avoided entering into any pissing contest traps that have been set by a few people posting on the message board. IMO, both companies are at very critical points in their histories where the issue of credibility becomes ever so crucial to their survival. We all know the reasons for this: BB listing, minimal earnings histories, etc., etc. I can tell you that the marketing firm's participation on the PNLK thread, albeit and rightly limited, has been a boon. It, again imo, has kept some of the float in some weak hands that might have been weaker --- in other words, it's made some weak hands strong. It has sent a signal to doubt mongerers that facts from an authoratative source can, to some extent, guide the price of a stock to its correct levels. I am in agreement that any officer from GNNX should not participate on this thread--they should be taking care of business. In lieu of a marketing firm, I think that Markox 5's concept of an internal IR person would be ideal. Most all reporting companies employ one and, as I understand it, their mandate and raison d'etre is to disseminate the facts and only the facts, Jack! At this point in GNNX's history the timing may be right for such an addition. Lazarre