SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mudcat who wrote (20428)5/11/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 32384
 
I find it funnier that he views negative comments on yahoo as an 'infection'. Must be courtney posting all those negative comments :-)



To: Mudcat who wrote (20428)5/11/1998 12:47:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
I really wasn't trying to give go_lgnd are hard time about his handle. I was just curious as to why (s)he chose it since (s)he appears to know so little about the company. Actually, LGND used to be the symbol of a company called Legend and there is a web site at lgnd.com , so I thought maybe (s)he was a bit confused about the thread that (s)he was posting on.



To: Mudcat who wrote (20428)5/11/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Actually, Courtney/r. Peter Dale/uncles/brothers/cousins/and who knows how many more mythical posters are long gone from SI and some expect them to show up sooner or later. Yahoo is a pretty easy mark.



To: Mudcat who wrote (20428)5/13/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Speaking of go_lgnd, is there any relationship between these two posts:

x1.dejanews.com
messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com



To: Mudcat who wrote (20428)5/13/1998 2:56:00 PM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 32384
 
>Speaking of go_lgnd, is there any relationship between these two posts:

1) Wasn't LGND supposed to 'fly' to $25 by now?

2) Why is LGND stuck at $14? Whoever that guy was on SI who predicted $14 is a friggin genius.


Other than the fact that they are accurate statements (especially post #2 :-)),
I don't see any relationship, do you?

--Tony (...or is it?)