Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Turboe who wrote (16862)	5/11/1998 5:18:00 PM
From: Gary Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Right, Ira reads the thread, and, in fact, one day last week indicated something to the effect that he was considering the suggestions. He also said he "has long sleeves." Well he better pull something out like a big ole fat rabbit to redeem himself for recent snafus. Questions, Ira, that need to be settled tomorrow must focus also on the facts of the reported or intimated SEC submission. 1. Why the delay? 2. Has the report in fact been submitted or not? 3. If so, then on what dates was it sent and rec'd by SEC? If not, a full and satisfactory explanation is req'd. 4. Why did no one at FAMH not know that it wasn't, or couldn't be (because of SEC review time for initial submissions), going to Edgar on the 4th? Just the facts, please. And, these kinds of questions and the ones posed by Laz today cannot be handled by Anna Love on Thursday's CC. (God save us all.) I still have all my shares at an average of .54 and I want this rec'd as a constructive post, but answers and action are required--stat. TIA Ira and everyone trying to support this investment. Gary

To: Turboe who wrote (16862)	5/11/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Terry Lyon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

I agree Turboe, but one thing that SI certainly doesn't necessarily achieve is the sense of unity. Cheryl and Brad were very sucessful in bringing unity to this thread initially, but now there are more people involved with all sorts of agendas. The only agendas that should count are those of the shareholders. The main problem with SI is it allows unscrupulous manipulators to rattle shareholders and shake loose shares at a cheap price which they just buy and resell at a higher price later. Who got hurt? Of course the unwary rattled investor. Where I grew up that was called stealing and not investing! Legal, but still stealing and unethical by many standards. With unity we could largely stop the manipulators of FAMH stock and I believe we would see a lot less fluctuation in the stock price and even feel more confident and in control of this investment. When manipulators step in and just take profits remember they have not contributed anything and they are stealing from shareholders and the company. This is precisely why BB stocks have such a bad reputation. So the way we protect ourselves and our company is by joining forces and raising common issues and suggesting important shareholder policies. These actions should be focused specifically upon building shareholder value because by doing so the companies financial health increases and positively affects company longevity. Also, it is important for a coelition of shareholders to work to resolve shareholder issues while not becoming a problem for the company. That is the company must focus on the business of the company whereas the coelition must focus on the the needs of the shareholder and not interfere with the business. The coelition has no intention to manage or micro manage any aspect of the companies business. The shareholder coelition's major problem is shareholder inter-communication to establish primary issues, develop a priority list for those issues, and recommended actions to the company. By offering solutions as recommendations, shareholders do not become part of the problem. The biggest problem is the Administration and inter-communication of shareholder concerns. We all know what the concerns are and we know that FAMH management knows what we are concerned about, so why the extra step. Unity - to show the company shareholders mean business and we're not going to be put off. Frankly, I work 50 hrs a week and volunteer another 15 hrs so my time is largely gone. We should discuss this for a few days to a week and somehow make a decision. Please post your suggestions on this thread. Also how can restricted inter-communication be provided with some form of central management? I received some private messages that RMIL shareholders are already in such cooperation. Thanks for reading my babble, Terry