Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stock talk who wrote (10920)	5/11/1998 7:47:00 PM
From: Ski	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14577

"Ski, are you sleeping OK?? " Stock Talk, Lo, even as I type, I am looking at the latest S3 propaganda on the Savage3D, hoisted from CGDC. What does all this stuff mean? I'm being driven mad... So, to answer your question: NO, I am not sleeping OK! The G*$ D(#@ oxygen mask isn't giving me enough air either! Anybody ever see "Blue Velvet"? Who is K? Did you know that periods of ellipsis are what the Greeks had to settle for because they didn't have "Yada, yada, yada" in their verbal arsenal? "..." ...the lingua franca of unenunciated thought... There's that darn "nun" word again. I sense an Ahab experience mounting... Ski

To: stock talk who wrote (10920)	5/12/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: dwight martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

I thought the CRUS settlement merely allowed SIII to continue to infringe CRUS' patents, and that it was only the Exponential patents, purchased by SIII outright, that could form the basis of an infringement suit brought by SIII. But I've been wrong before.

To: stock talk who wrote (10920)	5/12/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: David K.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

Interesting article. Who's next? Tell all Frank!! S3 sues Nvidia as IPO approaches By Michael Kanellos Staff Writer, CNET NEWS.COM May 11, 1998, 6:40 p.m. PT URL: news.com Nvidia, a rising star in the graphics processor world, has been hit with another patent infringement suit, a legal setback that could affect the value of the company's proposed initial public offering. S3 filed a patent infringement suit against Nvidia today in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claiming that Nvidia infringed upon three separate video patents in developing its Riva family of graphics processors. The suit seeks damages as well as a permanent injunction that would bar future distribution of Riva processors. The suit could be the first in a wave of actions from once-mighty S3 against its competitors, in as much as it relates to patents the company acquired from Cirrus in January. Right now, the company is evaluating these patents to see if claims exist against other graphics makers, said Walt Amaral, S3's chief financial officer. "We are looking at other competitors," he said. Nvidia merely happens to be the first suit the company has lodged, he added. The three patents involved in S3's case revolve around how graphics accelerators process video data, said Dr. Jon Peddie, president of Jon Peddie Associates, a Tiburon, California-based consultancy. In April, Silicon Graphics filed a similar suit against Nvidia which alleged that the company infringed upon SGI's texture-mapping patents in the development of the Riva family. Although the outcome or validity of either case is far from certain, both suits revolve around the core of Nvidia's business. The Riva line of graphics processors is all that the company makes. The processors have garnered fairly strong reviews and launched the company into the top rank of graphics vendors. Sources close to the company have stated that the company was gearing up for an IPO later this year. Although the lawsuits will not likely derail a proposed IPO, it could affect the initial value, speculated Peter Glaskowsky, an analyst with MicroDesign Resources. "They can't stop the IPO. The worst that they can do is decrease the value of it," he said. S3's motive in the suit appears to be primarily economic and seemingly provides an answer to why the company has been snapping up semiconductor patents. In January, the company acquired a number of patents from Cirrus. In February, it was discovered that S3 purchased 45 more patents developed by defunct processor maker Exponential for close to $10 million in a hotly contested silent auction that included heavyweights such as Intel and Digital. At the time of the purchases, analysts were confounded by S3's underlying motive. Cirrus's patents were considered by some to be fairly antiquated in the fast-moving graphics processor world. Exponential, meanwhile, failed to live up to its promise as a PowerPC vendor. S3 had also finished a difficult year financially because it had missed a product cycle. While some stated that S3 might have purchased the patents to fill in pieces in a long term product strategy, others speculated that S3 was actually trying to buy leverage. "They could use it to get into some kind of barter arrangement with Intel," mused Ashok Kumar, semiconductor analyst at Piper Jaffray, on the Exponential purchase. Amaral stated that S3 was acting to protect its intellectual property. He also dismissed the notion that S3 was trying to interfere with any plans for an IPO. The timing of the suit comes owes to the fact that S3 only learned recently learned of its claim. "We acquired these patents in January," he said, "It takes a while to figure out the details." By contrast, the SGI suit may contain a personal angle, Glaskowsky speculated. The patents at the heart of that case were developed by an SGI employee who subsequently left to join Nvidia.