Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carl a. mehr who wrote (55407)	5/12/1998 3:36:00 AM
From: Jeff Fox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Carl, re:"stockholders meeting" Think I would like to join you if I may? I'll be driving down... Jeff

To: carl a. mehr who wrote (55407)	5/15/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Carl, >>>(Last year I got Andy's autograph in the book: Only the Paranoid Survive). <<< This year, why not ask him what Intel is going to do about Tom Kurlak. AG could talk all he wants about roadmaps and visions but Kurlak can give you a $6 Billion dollar haircut with a few choice words whether you like it or not. Unlike you or Paul, you guys can afford to a get a haircut anywhere you want - but a lot of us small investors depend on our investments to provide for our family, our future, and perhaps our retirement - as small as it may be. If I thought Intel was a poorly managed or unethical company - I would divest immediately. But, I don't and I don't like Kurlak's ability to manipulate my investment and we need someone influential to help us - the small investor. I could only speak for myself, and don't do it well enough at all. But, Jules B. Garfunkel expresses it real well: exchange2000.com >>>What is most surprising to me though is how investors have allowed Kurlak's comments to have such great impact on the short term price, month after month. In addition, I also find fault with Intel, for allowing this monthly manipulation of their stock price by Merrill Lynch and Tom Kurlak, to continue. Intel's management must find a solution to this problem. Intel has to realize that the increased volatility in their stock price, caused by this analyst's comments, is not serving their investors, or themselves, well. <<< And furthermore, exchange2000.com Sincerely, Mary Cluney