Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIS: WHAT IS GOING ON? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chaz who wrote (2013)	5/12/1998 8:00:00 AM
From: Tobasco	Respond to of 6931

Chaz: Quit your bitching, get off your a-- and do your own DD. JimB said he got his info from the Transfer Agent regarding the number of shares. Seems this would be the most accurate. Call the Company and get the financials faxed to you, they are in that line of business! If you don't have what you want, ask for it! If you don't get satisfaction then you can bitch. The Company provided me audited 7/31/97 and self prepared interims for 10/31/97 and 1/31/98 (both signed by Don Cameron as the final quarterly figures) You have had some good points about "hard numbers" now go get them!

To: chaz who wrote (2013)	5/12/1998 8:04:00 AM
From: Michael T Currie	Respond to of 6931

> First question of the day....resolve the shares issue...Jim B said with emphasis yesterday it was 29,400,000....J Baker reposts the 23,000,000 (about) from Feb 10. Which is correct? If both are, then why the difference if the company ceased selling back door positions at 1/31, as my investor kit stated? > Second: Q1 ended 10/31....numbers are claimed to exist, but I did not receive them with my investor packet dated Feb 1998. Q2 ended 1/31, Q3 ended 4/30 and Q2 numbers still not available. This is not only no way to attract shareholders, it is not responsible management to tolerate such delay. This alone would be cause for me to sell. Suggest you reread the thread starting about two weeks ago. Answers to your questions are there if you are that interested. If someone else wants to waste his/her time answering questions for you, they are free to do so. > You guys are the shareholders, not me... Are some of you beginning to understand that I'm on your side. Uh-huh. Right. I do not trust you, chaz. What I would like from you is a very clear, unambiguous statement regarding 1) why you are here, 2) why you post under a pseudonym 3) why you decline to provide any sort of personal information about yourself, 4) how do you explain the coincidence of your appearance on this thread with that of Janice Shell and Tastes Like Chicken, with each of you asking questions showing quite clearly that you have not followed the discussion and none of you (apparently) are shareholders, and 5) why any shareholder should trust you. You have stated that TSIS management might be lying to us ('use the U.S. Mail...) and by implication, that the folks who are positive on the stock are either also lying or are naive. I suggest that the people on this thread should hold you, Janice, Chicken, myself, Bill Gavlick, Barbara, etc., etc. to the same high standards. Why do you deserve to be taken seriously?. Answering questions with further questions or with "Boy, isn't Mike Currie getting defensive when I start asking the difficult ones?" is not acceptable. You are, of course, not required to do any of the above, but as far as I am concerned, until these questions are answered, you will remain a highly suspicious character who does not deserve to share in any sort of reasonable debate on the relative merits of this company. I find your statement "This alone would be cause for me to sell" to be very revealing. Mike