Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (21891)	5/12/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: 007	Respond to of 95453

<So, does it make sense to sell it?> There is no right or wrong, just lots of different ways to make money (or lose it for that matter <ggg>). Traders gotta do their thing and investors gotta do theirs. Go with what makes sense to you. I think that mixing overbought as a technical condition with overvalued as a fundamental condition is only confusing. They both refer to different concepts and it's probably best not to try to combine them. Stochastics is a short-term indicator that helps to time entries and exits so that you can take advantage of short-term price movements. So it is best for short-term trading, but it's also useful to help time long-term position changes once you've decided with other criteria to make a long-term position change. Just my two pence, 007

To: jbe who wrote (21891)	5/12/1998 2:14:00 PM
From: RGinPG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

I've sold many "overbought, undervalued" stocks over the last 5 months or so successfully, always with the intention of buying back after short term (5 to 10 trading days) dips. You gotta believe in TA to do it though, with FA alone this strategy makes no sense. rgdoczzz.home.texas.net represents a trading system that I've been using since the beginning of the year with some success (so far). It works for me is all I can say.