Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karl Drobnic who wrote (16622)	5/12/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Karl, I would have to agree with you that the questions did waste an amount of time. There was no discussion of KO deal and the progress being made. Also, they should have emphasized their findings on the possibility of critical failures in sites they have examined thus far. Btw, have you ever spoken with the analyst from Cruttendon-Roth?? It would be interesting to get his "off-record" opinion and see if he plans on a write-up. Regards, Ron

To: Karl Drobnic who wrote (16622)	5/12/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Dear Karl: I agree with you and others about the poor quality of the questions. It appeared to me as though they felt they should ask something but really didnt know what to ask. I STRONGLY suggest that we select ONE person to represent us and prepare a list of questions for that person to ask. We tell Jenkins ahead of time we are going to do this and if possible even supply him with the questions. Then that person asks the questions. We could even ask Jenkins if there are any questions he would like us to ask. If we act together, we are a powerful force. JDN

To: Karl Drobnic who wrote (16622)	5/12/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: jan m.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

I was disappointed with this CC. I was hoping to hear more about Rick Cowles and his connection to the utility industry. I disagree about the discussion of the Hyman Marshall dispute being good--to me, it was a waste of valuable time and could have been addressed after the CC. I was more interested in hearing about the new clients and their projections for this current quarter. The good stuff, like NMS, mystery client, KO, got pushed to the back burner. IMHO Jan

To: Karl Drobnic who wrote (16622)	5/12/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: R. Bond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Karl and Stuart, I agree with you guys. The questions and tone of the questioners were frighteningly thin. All but one sounded half brain-dead IMHO. I could never imagine handing over my money to someone like that for investing advice. While there was good info, as you say, the scripting was very confining and left out a lot of topics of interest. I'd would rather have heard some fired up talk about KO and international expansion than being walked through a typical deal. Hope this dip is temporary. Cheers, Bond