Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : BUY RDOC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jasman who wrote (33)	5/12/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: Dennis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 130

Jasman, what do you think of earnings??? They sold 2 robots right?? Each is $658,000, I think. Well if IBM owns 30% already AND has rights to another 30% they must really like this company. My question is simple, WHY?????? They really want to get into this area that badly?? Good luck, I;m back in today after some quick trades yesterday. There has got to be a HUGE potential market JUST in the U.S. Baby boomers like myself are going to need all kinds of things replaced real soon. :o(

To: Jasman who wrote (33)	5/23/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: Bill Martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 130

Re: I copied what I think reflects a 30% ownership by IBM: Sorry for the late response, but I've been out of town (and out of the country) for a couple weeks. You missed the footnote (3) which I've attached below: (3) Includes warrants to purchase 2,079,584 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share exercisable until December 31, 2005, warrants to purchase 67,587 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share exercisable until December 31, 2000, and warrants to purchase 126,895 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share exercisable until December 31, 2005, all of which warrants are presently exercisable. This indicates that IBM currently zero RDOC stock, but they own a lot of warrants as I thought. Add up the warrant numbers from the footnote and you'll see they come to the full number mentioned in the table you posted. Another clue, as someone else mentioned, is that the table adds up to over 100% of the stock, and that's just the few major players (e.g. it doesn't count me!). Footnotes are important. Bill