SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael who wrote (10939)5/12/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: David K.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Naturally, I'd pick the first alternative.



To: Michael who wrote (10939)5/12/1998 7:20:00 PM
From: Ken Muller  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Michael:

A few observations while perusing the thread.

Its amazing how the comments have changed when S3 uses lawyers to sue someone else versus when shareholders sue the company. (Standing on principle is always difficult.)

If the patents were really that solid, Cirrus would have filed suit long ago.

Until S3 can become profitable the stock price will continue to languish. (This quarter is going to be particularly ugly.)

Calvin, your information sources are close to home.

Veritas,
ken



To: Michael who wrote (10939)5/12/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: Walter R. Roche  Respond to of 14577
 
Yes, this an interesting situation; Why was Intel so intent on getting those patents, They knew they needed them, underbidding them was just a misjudgement of scale.