SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zj who wrote (946)5/12/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: Curtis E. Bemis  Respond to of 3873
 
LVLT and MFNX-- How does that fit with XCOM ?

Interesting-- XCOM has POPs in the Northeast corridor and some
infrastructure--MFNX has dark fiber there. Does that fit??
I understand the POPs from XCOM and their customers for LVLT. Would
it not be cheaper for LVLT to "grow their own" ??



To: zj who wrote (946)5/12/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: Ken98  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3873
 
Why MFNX? Aren't their routes the same (or very similar) as RCNC? MFNX has some access to Chicago that is not duplicative but most of their Northeast routes seem very similar to RCNC. If that is so, what would the advantage be to picking up same routes? Is RCN going to be used just for switched services and not IP?

Isn't the MFNX head an ex MFS guy?

Sorry for all the questions - thanks for any help. Ken.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News