Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: techstocker who wrote (17226)	5/12/1998 8:08:00 PM
From: Prophet	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 27968

It is not unusual for CEOs to post on SI. What's unusual is for them to post when they have lost 1/2 of their fortune. Too little too late! Arif should had posted four weeks ago when concerns started to pop up on this board. Anyway you look at it FAMH is doomed. with at least another 8MM shares issued, a portion of that is bound to wind up in the float. So all of you should ask yourselves the following question: If FAMH during the good times, when the float was 10MM or less and public sentiment was at its highest, could not break out of the pack, what makes you think it is now in a better position to break out? If FAMH were to reach 50 cents again, Cheryl OD, Jin, Jane, and all these self-proclaimed FAMH supported would be first ones to sell. That was the reason why FAMH never made pass .64 (77 cents for a few seconds). Be real! FAMH is not an investment, it is a gamble. Most of you should go to Las Vegas and join Ira. You have better chances of hitting the jack pot out there than to speculate with FAMH. Wake up! By the way, most of you should be graceful that conscious investors like LE, Andrew, Forest Gump, and myself are willing to stick our necks to uncover the truth about FAMH.

To: techstocker who wrote (17226)	5/12/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: Lurker	Respond to of 27968

Well, you might as well leave. You were way off on your .25 prediction. It only got down to .26 (knock on wood). I hope none of your other stocks are as bad as FAMH.

To: techstocker who wrote (17226)	5/12/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: M. Murray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

IF: This thread was a listed company, AND: The number of posts equaled volume, AND: Negative posts equated to upward momentum, AND: Positive posts meant downward momentum, I: Would sell everything I own and buy stock in this thread!!! I am just like everyone else on this thread who could beef about broken promises or release dates ya da ya da ya da, BUT I bought it because I have faith in the sector, the company i.e. management, and I am willing to wait for it to all to fall in to place, if I did not feel this way I would have determined that this stock is a dog and bailed. I am not saying that all posts should be positive about the company but progress in many cases takes time. The only mistake that I see Ira and co. making is giving investors deadlines as far as to when news, or earnings or Edgar or ya da ya da ya are going to take place. I for one am very comfortable with my stake in this company. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither was FAMH! MM