Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (6107)	5/13/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6843

Elmer: <It was just a typical Fuchi post> Yes, it was a typical post, and it contained the THREE valid points: 1. Intel was not able to propose a technical/ economical solution for a high-speed GENERAL BUS that would sustain enough performance in long-term; 2. Intel cheats the general public with iCOMP (because the iCOMP discounts practical aspects - memory/cache/disk latencies - in favor of CPU internals); 3. Achievemnts in dumb clock-jacking (due to die plain shrinks) must be attributed to semiconductor equipment manufacturers, not to Intel. (To keep pipe layout straight and fab technician's hand clean are not a breaking achievements). It is apparent that it is you who missed the whole point. You also failed to respond to any of my technical points. I even suspect you cannot spell out most of the terms in that post. - Ali#2 (or#1?) Now back to Ali#1: <Why do you see a post to someone else as such a threat to you?> He is not just "someone", he is a fellow AMD investor and SI contributor. In addition, his post was not directed to you as well. I simply responded to your totally outrageous form of communication with Fuchi and your "math" theory you used in attempt to cut him down. To refresh your memory I reiterate your words (and my reply): <Ask your nurse, she'll do the math for you, after all, she's there to help you.> And now shut your stinking mouth up and never show up your ignorant nose again in technical matters on this threads. Is that clear now? - Ali #1 P.S. The text above contains a small misprint. Instead of "your ignorant nose" it should read "your ignorant snout". (I found this word recently, in attempt to learn more into "common (Americanized) English":) - Ali#1