SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (32646)5/13/1998 1:40:00 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1572702
 
<Elmer , re. 2.5nsec timing = 400mhz that involves higher mathematics (vbg) Brian>

Thanks Brian but I was able to figure that one out. I guess for AMD customers that does mean higher math. 400mhz must not be enough to get the meaning across. Must be why Intel doesn't bother to include that "spec" <ebg>

EP

ebg = even bigger grin - for Fuchi's sake, others please disregard.



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (32646)5/14/1998 12:47:00 AM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 1572702
 
Brian,

Re: "That involves higher mathematics (vbg) ... PS 2.5 nsec for a cycle
time . 1000/2.5 = 400mhz"

Doesn't look like you understand even "lower" mathematics, Brian ... You
have "messed up" the equation that you are trying to use to prove your point.
1000/2.5 = 400 not 400mhz ... unless you can tell us what the unit of
measure is for the 2.5 and 1000 in "your" equation.

You've over reached yourself again, Brian <vvbg>

Make It So,
Yousef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News