Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moonglow who wrote (5460)	5/13/1998 3:39:00 AM
From: dch	Respond to of 50264

[Caution: non-informative post] Juanita, I think you got the last word in--so you WIN! BTW, I agree with you and jwk. Bottom line, Byron started this thread, and if he's satisfied with its content, tone, volume, etc., then I guess it's working ok. When it comes under attack or gets out of whack, he usually has something to say to protect it or bring it back. I think the thread may have gotten a little tense today because there are more people with serious money (I suppose it's all serious, but some may have bet their farm or pharmacy) that got in later and are watching it diminish (on paper) before their justifiably watchful eyes. When that happens there's not much support or tolerance for mirth or merriment. Those who got in earlier still have a lot of room to relax. Of course, if one has been dutifully reading the thread long enough and believes the information provided here and has done their own DD as well, and firmly believes DGIV has a great future, then the MM Chinese Water Torture (little daily drips and drops in the share price) can be ignored despite the paper losses--they can more easily be seen as illusionary. But if there's still some doubt, and you've placed a major wager and you see it trickling away--I can't blame those investors for being anxious and wanting to ban the nonessential data. So maybe I should save my save my attempts at humor for time (soon, no doubt) that DGIV drives past 8. Then no one will care how many posts there are or what their content is--at least for awhile. Anxious myself now to see the "newsletter" Byron said is going out. --dch

To: Moonglow who wrote (5460)	5/13/1998 9:42:00 AM
From: LAWRENCE C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Yes it can be a challenge to keep up with the posts on this fun thread but it is better than not having enough posts to keep the interest in the thread. This thread was created for those wishing to have fun and commaraderie. Lucky Lawrence

To: Moonglow who wrote (5460)	5/13/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: DianaX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Good Morning/Afternoon! Point taken, Juanita (and all her supporters)! (You are up later than ME reading posts) After a good night's sleep, my frenzied postings of last night (quite out of character for me, as you well know) are a dim memory. Mark C. & Denise have found the best solution and I am being referred to the Ship's Counselor for a therapy session consisting of my repeating the mantra: "I DO believe in posts...I DO believe in posts...I DO believe in posts..." PLUS, I have been instructed to POST MORE myself as part of a desensitization process. SO, POST AWAY! Diana