Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Archangel who wrote (2124)	5/13/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Roger G. Budgell	Respond to of 5164

Sir Robert: I hope you are correct cus I'm continuing to accumulate. Prices below $2.00 is cheapo. I can't seem to resist.I brought a bunch yesterday. I'm either going to be rich beyond my dreams or I'll have to move in with Kim. My fate is in his hands. Kim the troops are getting weary they need not moral but financial support. Please make them happy again. Roger

To: Archangel who wrote (2124)	5/13/1998 11:23:00 PM
From: c.r. earle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5164

Trading on the big board uh, that's a good one! Poor old Sungold, everyone did them wrong and it certainly is not any of their responsibility what has occurred to the company. It can't be,....really. Well Archangel, tell me who ultimately is responsible for this company and where it sits today. We could certainly begin detailing many occurrences in the past yr+, but I am certain most do not want to go there. Many of my inquiries over the last year directed at the company were met with overly optimistic responses, time frames predicated almost always delayed. It is not a question as to what I would have had the company do during this past year and half, the question remains what exactly has the company achieved besides saving our shares from being wallpaper. You say they had not alternative but to list for trading on the pink sheets. How exactly did they arrive at that point of having little or no alternatives. As I have stated the ultimate responsibility rest with the people in charge. I do not run the company nor do I have the ability to change its direction, I only control what I ultimately do with my shares. <<Explain to me what it is exactly that the company has done in their day to day activities that disappoints.>> That's a good one! Well I just do not know where to begin. I am happy with everything. (extreme sarcasm) I think some limited thinking is occurring here (and no insult intended). What a question, who the hell knows what it is specifically they are doing on a day to day basis. It is the cumulative effect I am extremely disappointed with. From my point of view it certainly has not been enough. But oopps, I forgot it is not their responsibility. If your not very disappointed and feel that their are doing just fine, well that's great. I salute your contentment. I simply do not view it in the same manner. <<The bottom line is this...the company is doing the best it can on all fronts...Jus because shareholders want things to happen NOW doesn't mean SQUAT...>> "NOW" you say. Well I would have been quite happy say 6 months ago, or even 3 months ago. And then good ole Rome comes into the picture, well how long did it take? And were the Roman's telling their shareholders that it was going to be built in a day? Betcha they never were halted for 11 months and then forced to trade on the pinks sheets. Sure I will come back and admit my errors when it is trading at $10 post split. Hope your not waiting as long as the Roman's did. Regards