Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (16758)	5/13/1998 5:24:00 AM
From: RumKola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

JDN Concur with your thoughts. Also, it seems to me that no one has posted thoughts on potential revenue streams from the national and international associations that were briefly mentioned in the earnings release. I really don't expect that these associations will entail significant added expenses for TAVA, so the revenue should mostly drop directly to the bottom line. JDP

To: JDN who wrote (16758)	5/13/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 31646

JDN, re: core business and a few comments. 1) TAVA's core business is declining. Why do you persist with the fantasy that this is not true? Anyone can verify this by reading the press release: biz.yahoo.com And last quarter's information is in TAVA's 10-QSB filing with the SEC: sec.gov 2) Regarding repeating myself, you wrote: "you keep repeating this base business business over and over" The only reason I repeated this factual information (and repeat it again) is because Mr. Zahran (and now you) continue to post FALSE information. Mr. Zahran should retract his statement and admit that TAVA's core business is declining. When someone posts false information about an easily verifiable fact, why should anyone believe him (or her) about anything else? 3) Name Calling and Profanity. I never resort to name calling or the use of profanity. This only diminishes you ... not me! Without Regards, Bill