Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. B. Knecht who wrote (33735)	5/13/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: elk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Joe until he is gone, this thread will not be a good read, and that is his entire point. He has successfully, and apparently with SI's blessing, put an end to the good quality posts and his very presence, now ensures that this is not an environment for information. His attacks on the company, his spreading of false information, and now his attacks to the thread itself, guarentee that his presence will not allow anything, but the crap we have seen. If you do not believe me, look at the NWCI thread. He singlehandedly put an end to it. It went from having hundreds of posts a month, to nothing. That is his purpose here, and it is ridiculously obvious.

To: J. B. Knecht who wrote (33735)	5/13/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 41046

Is anyone seeing a pattern here? I try to be nice and they try to instigate. This was the offer I suggested the morning: Message 4436455 CD: $ 24.81b $ 24.88a VALUESPEC valuespec.com

To: J. B. Knecht who wrote (33735)	5/13/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

JBK> I agree, and will leave this board alone with what I am posting across SI so others understand what VS is all about. Yes, he does have a few good qualities, but enough is enough. SI, won't do a dam thing, so I will post 20 times on each SI board that VS posts and each will be from the beginning of SI when he first started posting. I appologize to all for my crap, but after reading value's web site in regards to Franlin, my posts what where meant as 'speculation" and I said that, only to be turned into a "personal attack" stating they were "estimates" and more, I don't have any recourse be to expose him for what he really is across SI> I have a month off from my next job, and plan to use FTel back as far as he has been on and post 20 times each on every SI board that he posts on to let others know, step by step! unless? He stops posting all together on this thread! I have the time and am totally commmited on this. Any post by me on VS will be stated on other threads that he posts and probably allot more just to be sure others really understand what this guy is all about. One day at a time, 20 posts elsewhere for every 1 post he makes here! again, I appologize its my last statement about VS

To: J. B. Knecht who wrote (33735)	5/13/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Gunther G. Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

Dear J.B., I heartily agree. I would also ask that the emotional attacks and counter-attacks be made on on personal e-mails and not on this FTEL thread. There were a series of posts asking about the NASDAQ listing, and the frustration folks are feeling at deadlines not being met around this issue. Now this is something "factual" and tangible about this company that needs to be addressed. This is the type of broken promise or unmet expectation that I brought up in my previous post and that have me second-guessing this stock. Please let's try to stay on top of this type of information and on track. Let the cat fighting take place somewhere out of sight from this thread that we are paying for the privilege of using to discover the facts about FTEL.