Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CH who wrote (6731)	5/14/1998 4:04:00 AM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

<< Or that lawyer is particularly interested in Net+Arm or Gigamux and they refused to collect cash? >> Who is going to refuse cash? The more likely scenario is that Osicom was running a little low on cash and figured, "What's another 37,000 on top of 2.3 million? Shareholders are already looking at another 2.3 million shares potentially hitting the market, they surely won't notice another 37,000. Heck, we've already diluted the share count by several millions with nothing to show for it, shareholders must be used to it by now."

To: CH who wrote (6731)	5/14/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: vibaby	Respond to of 10479

<I think they increased the number of shares by 37,500 which was issued to Volpe Brown Whelen &Co LLC, is this a law firm or some sort of service? > Volpe is an investment banking firm based in California.

To: CH who wrote (6731)	5/14/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Scott Ozer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

I think, no, know you don't know what you are talking about. You must be ignorant of the facts or just joined this thread, in which case you shouldn't be giving such an uninformed opinion. If you just took the time to compare the filings, which is easy, you could see the shares are the same, the number of selling shareholders is the same. All that changed is the safe harbor statement was added and the opinion by Ray felton was updated. Volpe is not a law firm. You figure out who they are, interesting, don't you think.