Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SYQUEST -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Coley who wrote (6389)	5/14/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Richard James	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7685

Michael, I have a lot of respect for your analytical abilities, and wonder if you have factored in another cash source: product sales. It seems that syqt did a pretty good job of ramping up production last q and grater production is expected this q. Should financing be required, wouldn't you expect more favorable terms? Having owned both companies, one thing I think the Edheads have right that caused iomega grief is their policy with preannouncing products. I suspect that Quest is near production, but won't be announced until it is ready to ship. BTW, were you finally able to find a broker to let you short syqt? Richard James

To: Michael Coley who wrote (6389)	5/18/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: Robert Skinner	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7685

Michael: Withen my personal close circle of investores I herd that CPQ may have or is establishing a closer OEM relationship with SYQT. I personaly think this rummor is without foundation. Do you have any info about this that you could share. I will inquire further from my source and inform you if there is anything to this. Please relize that this alleged oem as far as I am concurned is nothing more than very old news to me at this point. I belive this is the same stuff we have known for years. I just don't want to discount this without checking all possable sources. Thanks for your help. Bob