SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (5843)5/14/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: Roads End  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6980
 
Sorry, Intended this for blankmind,

Not all of this past event is rumor if you consider specific quoted statements as fact. To blame WS for all of this is to make management unaccountable for their own actions and comments. I agree that a "no comment" is best for most cases but only as a rule of thumb. Other cases require a response to avoid liability and to respond to one set of comments does not require a response to others.
Steve



To: Bosco who wrote (5843)5/14/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: Roads End  Respond to of 6980
 
I marveled the Damilier and Chrysler deal myself. Their managements were astute enough to keep a tight lip and not make leading comments. Something this management has been unable to do. Because much of yesterday's activity was precipitated by this inability it is the precise reason an official comment is required. To not comment implies truth in this instance and if found to be untrue will lead to liability problems in the future.
Steve


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News