Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : LGOV - Largo Vista Group, Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BlueCheap who wrote (1485)	5/14/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Trumptown	Respond to of 7209

100% - NOT!...could be 50% <g>

To: BlueCheap who wrote (1485)	5/14/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7209

Those who holler fire in a crowded theater really show lack of class but you do what you want; you accomplished your purpose. JMO, but this trick is done all the time on every thread on SI. Those of us who chose to retain our holdings know why we did not sell and are still holding. In the long term scheme of things it is all a moot point. My biggest disappointment is you portrayed your self as a friend, who shared the interest of all the long term holders of this thread, but acted in opposition too such. But, I will get over it. I have no problem with your action (selling) that is your right; and I have up held it. If you really read what I posted you would have seen and understood this. Your posting of your actions, displayed a direct attack and did much to start a sell off of the weak and doubting but that's okay too. Mission accomplished... yours not ours. LOL As to my straight forwardness in sharing the fact that I was not selling it was MY personal choice. I did not hold a gun to anyone's head to follow. I am not a sheep herder. I do not want anyone to blindly follow me. I suspect if they did they must believe in the company. Most of us have had a goal to support the company and the stock in hopes of getting the price up; not down. We are working towards the goal of meeting the requirements for obtaining a listing on the NASDAQ Small Cap Exchange. We will get there in spite of you or anyone else. To any and all who are sorry they are still holding I can only say you just don't know the value of this stock or the company. Since I do; I will remain steady in my approach and support. When the day comes and I decide to take a profit and I will. I can assure you it will be my business and you will never know about it; I have no mission to accomplish. I find it tacky to expose personal affairs in public; besides, I would not want anyone to follow me blindly. I operate a class act in my life and am not ashamed of it. Malcolm, you accomplished your mission and we will just let it rest there for now. I vote to allow all to judge you by your actions and draw their own conclusions. Perhaps, I just do not understand the original purpose of a company thread? I gathered from other threads and participants that it was for the purpose of supporting the company. By supporting the stock ie, the company it would greatly assist in seeing certain goals and objectives accomplished that will benefit all concerned; ie getting the price up for our listing. What has been displayed on this thread is nothing short of a free for all for the self serving; all nicely done under rights; rights are wonderful but responsibility is a part of rights. JMO * You allude to the fact that I somehow did not copy and paste ALL of your post. Perhaps, it was a fresh post and since you have up to 15 minutes to add or change it as you see fit, it may not have been completed as it stands now. However, I assure you I selected ALL text that was present at the time and pasted it. So if it is not exactly what you have corrected or changed it too that could be a possibility and I had no way of knowing it was being amended. As to threating me to "crash" the new thread with your crap, I would encourage you to consider the value of your SI MEMBERSHIP. I have publicly posted a notice stating that all short term traders are requested NOT to post and would be considered as " CRASHER'S" and reported to management as a trouble maker. This has resulted in others losing a valuable membership. It is a dead issue and quite frankly you are not worth the effort, JMO It's a LARGO DAY! Dusty :o)

To: BlueCheap who wrote (1485)	5/14/1998 4:15:00 PM
From: Wally	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7209

Malcolm: I've just caught a few headlines concerning the ongoing feud about your taking profits on runs. If I'm reading the argument correctly, you are 100% correct. We do NOT run these corporations, we loan them money and become TEMPORARY and very part-time "owners." Whether temporary means selling for a 1 cent profit or a 1 million profit is only the business of the lender. One could argue that selling for a million is more damaging. The fact is that you're taking the same percentage bite wherever you bail out. I wish I'd bailed out sooner than later more often than not (with the possible exception of FNTN which I may hold long no matter the profit and only because I didn't didn't sell on early run-offs). Regards, Wally