SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SI Diamond Technology (SIDT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: myturn who wrote (306)5/14/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: dwight martin  Respond to of 623
 
I have looked at the new stuff on "HyFED" on the web page. We need to know the following:

(1) How each electron gun (no more 1:1 ratio between emitters and pixels, as was apparently the case in the old DFED prototype) is controlled onto multiple pixels;

(2) The cost of manufacturing vs. other flat technologies and conventional tubes;

(3) Are they still using "diamondoid" on the cold cathode?

I remain suspicious, but am not out. And, I must remind all that a few years ago SIDT claimed to have made some real advances in phosphor formulation and maybe in applying phosphor to screen. That brings up:

(4) What are they using for phosphors in the "HyFED"?

I hope "HyFED" doesn't stand for "Hype Fools Every Day."



To: myturn who wrote (306)5/14/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: Joe Master  Respond to of 623
 
That is the most idiotic post I have seen in a long time. We finsihed strong toda.We will definately gap up in the morning. What the hell were you looking at. Those guys got it pumped up to $.70 at 3:00 and then dumped it down to to $.52 then it finally closed at $.58. So I guess if losing close to 20% in one hour is strong you are right otherwise you are clueless.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News