SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mike cobble who wrote (10810)5/14/1998 10:18:00 PM
From: bill c.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
Mike: After looking at the Westell report....

....For the three months ended March 31, 1998, the loss from
continuing operations was $6.4 million, or 18 cents per share,
compared to a loss of $4.3 million, or 12 cents per share, in the
same quarter last year. The increased loss was expected and was
due mainly to a valuation allowance of $2.9 million for deferred tax
benefits generated during the quarter. Tax benefits will still
accrue to the company,
but since the value of the resulting deferred
tax asset would have exceeded the value of tax planning strategies
available, this valuation reserve was required in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles....


Loss from continuing 4Q98 4Q97
operations before taxes (6,367) (7,368)
Benefit for income taxes -- (3,030)
Effective tax rate 0.0% 41.1%
Loss from continuing operations $(6,367) $(4,338)

Basic and diluted loss per
common share from
continuing operations (0.18) (0.12) NM


biz.yahoo.com

Westell didn't take the tax break on th 6.367million loss for this
quarter. There was also that one time charge of $600,000 granted to
Gary Seamans for his retirement.... until later.



To: mike cobble who wrote (10810)5/14/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
mike--

good point on the BEL could be positive. he said that a number of times though, alluding to the fact that since it has been delayed the ramp will be much broader than expected. personally, this view is completely justified. the telcos have had long enough to work out the details, all they need now is a regulatory go ahead.

good luck to all,
trey