Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Joe Copia's daytrades/investments and thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Swift who wrote (2688)	5/14/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Joe Copia	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25711

Very nice post on NUKE Tom. Thanks for contibuting. Joe PTG&LI !!! ps. I think a spell check is in order :)

To: Tom Swift who wrote (2688)	5/14/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Rose Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25711

Re: NUKE My friend RavenCrazy just sent me the following email regarding NUKE: "I was interested in lithium drifting years ago but became distracted by the possibilities of combining some of its variable usages with desktop fusion -- the obvious ones in addition to a further exploration of mini-proton procreation, in the sense that protons are thought to be procreatable if ionized properly. Of course, there are skeptics who do not believe in the ionization of subatomic particles, but ...As Rolf Windsor wrote in the Swiss study last summer, subatomic particles have been ionized in many senses for YEARS." My question is this -- was she was explicitly referring to neutrons in that classification of subatomic particles? I can't really grasp the significance of the protons at all and have never come across anything that would suggest their inclusion in a study of subatomic particle procreation possibilities. Rose

To: Tom Swift who wrote (2688)	5/15/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: musicguy	Respond to of 25711

I knew a Tom Swift that was an engineer at Record Plant NYC in the Jurassic period... (early mid 80's) I was there making records and horrible jingles... is that you Tom? MG

To: Tom Swift who wrote (2688)	5/15/1998 1:40:00 AM
From: musicguy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25711

Tom , nevermind... after reading your technical analysis of NUKEs patent, there is NO way you could be confused with the audio engineer I knew... unless he was cramming physics and quantum mechanics between AC/DC sessions... MG