Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGraham who wrote (4550)	5/14/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Gordon, 1) No not at all. I have seen massive sulfide intersections disappear less than 5m away (not 15m mind you). But there is validity to your statement << if this was any kind of body at all>>. If the geophysics was interpreted properly this probably is not a very extensive body. Just a sub-economic zone perhaps. 2) I believe the geo-sections presented to date are incorrect. I believe that this was the target depth, BUT we were given very little spatial information today (i.e. collar elevation and coordinates, even the orientation of the hole.) So many of my guesses presented today are rough. I am compiling an area map and new sections that I might get posted over the weekend. 3) They are obviously up a bit so there is the possibility that they are in a dynamic area of the "plumbing system" and more good stuff (mafic/massive) could be in the gneiss. Large pendants of gneiss are not uncommon. Don't hold you breath, they will yank these holes before 100m of footwall if at all possible. 1King