To: jhild who wrote (2255 ) 5/15/1998 11:35:00 AM From: JOE TURMAINE Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7491
jhild, you don't know how timely your last post was. I ran out of time on my last post to Jan so I'll post it here. Jan, you've stated a number of times that a couple of phone calls to the company does not constitute proper "due diligence", surely arguing with shareholders is not proper due diligence either. Once CASHCO becomes fully reporting they will have to satisfy the SEC with answers to all pertinent questions. CASHCO has also made it clear that they will hire a reputable PR firm to handle shareholder information. The success of my investment relies on the success af CASHCO. I believe that the assault on this thread directed at CASHCO is having a negative effect on CSHK stock price. If the reduced stock price proves to have a negative impact on CASHCO's ability to generate funds then the attacks regardless of intent are hurting those of us who have invested in the company. It would be great if we could all sit back and deal with the facts as they emerge. Again, you know how you reacted to a number of phone calls that were deemed unwelcomed, give CASHCO the same consideration. Don't call the neighbors, the patients, the suppliers. Call RHONDA. You might be pleasantly surprised. jhild, I caught the "M'am", JOE is short for JOSEPH, my profile states one wife, two kids, so "M'am" is not correct. Although, I am JOE & it is Friday. I didn't get a straight answer when I asked if the j was for Judy? Have a great weekend!! JOE PS. I went to Petland & COSTCO yesterday to check out pet supplies generally, but specifically litter products. There seem to be large stacks of high volume brand name products that sell tons per week. If this wood based product os CASHCO's establishes a market we will all make money. If it does NOT catch on we (those of us who are invested) will likely lose money. But, you know what, I didn't feel the need to check any of the bags to see where the litter products were produced. JOE