SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Strauss who wrote (16986)5/15/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: JSI  Respond to of 31646
 
I agree with you on a possible alliance with IBM. I just don't see an acquisition. If I read too much into your original post....

IBM has made a habit of partnering with just about everyone for various types of Y2K solutions. Tava would probably benefit greatly from this type of relationship. Who knows?

JSI



To: James Strauss who wrote (16986)5/15/1998 1:37:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets  Respond to of 31646
 
Bear in mind there are other IT companies with large sacks of money on hand that have a distinct interest in TAVA's forte.

K



To: James Strauss who wrote (16986)5/15/1998 3:53:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 31646
 
[HEALTHCARE] 'NHS falling behind in Millennium bug battle'

Thinking of the TAVA / CMED alliance...

John
_____

'NHS falling behind in Millennium bug battle
By Celia Hall, Medical Editor

External Links

Global impact
of Year 2000
bug - CSSA
Year 2000
Information
Service

The
Millennium
Bug - Year
2000
Millennium
resource

Year 2000
Information
Centre

The
Millennium
bug and what
to do about it
- Execom

ONE in seven hospital trusts has told the National Audit Office that it has no confidence
that its medical equipment will work in the year 2000 because of the Millennium bug.

Target dates for adjusting NHS computer systems are beginning to slip, says the audit
office, adding that "in many cases robust contingency plans have yet to be developed".
Potential problems involve medical equipment on wards and devices in operating theatres,
lifts, telephones and security systems that contain microprocessors.

The Department of Health knows contingency plans will be needed to cover systems that
have not been satisfactorily changed and that the challenge is "massive". Baroness Jay,
the health minister, announced yesterday that the NHS was ordering improved
management, more information and more planning to get the computer technology ready
for 2000.

The cost of avoiding failures in computer systems and electronic devices will be at least
œ230 million, says the audit office. It says the timetable is tight and time is running out.
The report, published today, also says that one in 10 NHS trusts is not confident that its
administrative computer systems will be compliant with the year 2000.

In addition, the report, The Millennium Threat II, found that almost all health authorities, 92
per cent, said awareness among family doctors was "not good" and a third said it was
poor. The report also criticises the lack of central planning, which means duplication of
work as hundreds of hospitals ask the same questions of their main suppliers.

To save space, many computer programs use the last two digits of a date, "98" instead of
"1998". This means computers cannot tell the difference between 1900 and 2000 and will
fail or produce meaningless information unless they are changed. The NHS uses
thousands of infusion pumps with embedded microchips, giving accurate doses of drugs to
seriously-ill patients. If the pumps are not recalibrated every six months, a safety device
shuts them down. At the year 2000, the device will assume it has not been recalibrated for
100 years and stop functioning.

Sir John Bourne, head of the audit office, said: "From our survey, it is clear NHS trusts
have concerns about meeting the timetable." He recommends that the NHS Executive
monitors progress very closely, "taking immediate action if necessary, to ensure that all
health authorities and trusts successfully complete all elements of the project".

He said the NHS executive should consider selective, direct intervention for trusts in
trouble and increase efforts to tell GPs of the consequences of future problems. The
report also covers the Department of Social Security, which has costed the work at œ43
million. The audit office found that it should "continue its well-structured approach" and
take immediate action if timetables slip.

The health department, expected to announce extra money to deal with the Millennium
problems, said yesterday it was ordering a quarterly progress report from July to the end
of 1999 involving doctors and nurses in risk analysis and planning. A third measure is to
set a deadline of Sept 30, 1999 "to ensure that all parts of the NHS are fully prepared or
have effective contingency plans in place".

Baroness Jay said yesterday: "As the year 2000 approaches, the department's main
concern is to ensure that patient care and safety are not compromised by technology
problems. I recognise that the year 2000 presents us with a massive challenge in the
health service. However, reports show good overall progress and they have identified the
areas we need to focus on."

Stephen Thornton, chief executive of the NHS Confederation representing health
authorities and trusts, was "extremely disappointed" with the response to the report.
"Nothing in this report surprises me," he said. "We need money and strong technical
support, not more bureaucracy."

telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=000158118408973&pg=/et/98/5/15/nmil15.html