Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (55583)	5/15/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary relax .. just think Intel probably sold a lot of those very profitable puts today! TKs comments just improve Intels bottom line. Gersh

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (55583)	5/15/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, Re: > ">>>MARKET MANIPULATIONS YES!<<< This is a tragedy. The market has taken over $5 Billion off of Intel market cap based on Kurlak's assessment - which repeats earlier statements and adds very little insights based on new research." < The closest thing this thread has to the truth and the company's (Intel) knowledge of the facts is Paul Engel's statement that Krulak is WRONG in his latest comments about wafer capacity due to switch from 0.35 to 0.25 micron process. Message 4473059 I think the only real (and quick) solution to stop this Kurlak bs is for Intel to have immediately rebutted -via equal time on CNBC- and given the listening public the FACTS as they are known! Why they chose to allow him to, not so much manipulate, but to do it with false information is puzzling to say the least? TTOSBT