Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearded One who wrote (19103)	5/15/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 24154

Most people don't know squat about anti-trust laws in general. Most people believe that "Big" anything is bad, be it business, labor, government, whatever. "Simplistic philosophy", as you cynically put it, is precisely what needs to be aired and debated. In my view, Microsoft has to take on the current laws and expose them for what they truly are or they don't stand a chance. I personally think they will back down and reap the consequences. I'm sure you will be pleased at that scenario.

To: Bearded One who wrote (19103)	5/15/1998 9:04:00 PM
From: Larry Sullivan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

If any new laws were being discussed I don't think that this is going to matter. If the government has made the decision to be in the technology industries face (which I believe it has with the merger suits being filed, Microsoft, Intel, NY States class action suit against Intuit, Autodesk) this could bode ill for the likes of Oracle who has a very commanding marketshare in enterprise database, or Sun who very soon could have the unenvieable position of close to 100% market share in Unix (purchased) workstations and servers. I think many people in the high tech industry call for regulation/intervention etc...but one the nose is in the tent it is too late. Larry...

To: Bearded One who wrote (19103)	5/16/1998 5:02:00 AM
From: Gerald R. Lampton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

If any new laws were being discussed, then I might agree that the question is, at least partially, governments role in the marketplace. Yet no new laws are being proposed about Microsoft, and most people are happy that we have antitrust laws in general. Well, one thing you've got to remember is that antitrust law is not some static, concise guideline like the speed limit on a highway or the law against murder. It changes with the times, keeping pace with the economic and political theories that motivate people in the political arena. So, when you say that no new laws are being proposed and the issue is not government's role in the marketplace, while it's true that no amendments are being proposed to the Sherman Act, I would beg to differ. Beneath the surface of the statute's very broad language, some very significant changes indeed are being proposed in the law's meaning, and under what circumstances and how vigorously it is enforced. Like society in general, the economic theories that underlie antitrust jurisprudence are starting to move in a more liberal/populist direction. Specifically, the Microsoft case gives the government a chance to try out new economic theories to see if they will fly, just as the Chicago School advocates got their chance to apply their theories to government policy during the Reagan Era. It just so happens that Network Externalities and Raising Rivals' Costs tend to lead to a more activist enforcement posture, and a more active government role in the economy, than do traditional Chicago style theories. That's why liberals tend to like these new theories and want to try them out in new cases like the one the DOJ is about to file against Microsoft. These changes may be for the better, and we may like them. But to say that the case against Bill Gates is just about enforcing the antitrust laws in the same way that pulling over an errant motorist is about enforcing the speed limit, the way Orrin Hatch implies every time he gets up on his high horse, is to ignore what is really going on.