Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Year 2000 (Y2K) Embedded Systems & Infrastructure Problem -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Mansfield who wrote (375)	5/15/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: John Mansfield	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 618

[UTILITIES] 'could we also experience "Y2K babies" as well?' 'Opening Statement of Congresswoman Constance A. Morella Chairwoman Subcommittee on Technology House Committee on Science "MILLENNIUM SHORT CIRCUIT: Y2K EFFECT ON ENERGY UTILITIES" Thursday, May 14 1998 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. 2318 Rayburn House Office Building ________________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the eighth hearing on the Year 2000 computer problem by the Technology Subcommittee. Today we are focusing on the effect of the computer glitch on, perhaps, the most fundamental necessity of our modern society - electrical energy. Energy provided by our electric utilities is a critical catalyst to the operations of virtually every sector of our nation's economy. If power shuts down, the rest of our society will shut down in its wake. The Year 2000 problem, if left unaddressed, has the potential to short circuit our nation's power sources and severely disrupt the delivery of energy to the American public through systematic power failures. The fact is, we already know the consequences of power failures and the devastating impact they cause to our economy and our quality of life. Whenever a storm or a blizzard or a tornado knocks down power lines and cuts off electricity for a period of time, we are experiencing a power failure. As a result, we have experienced catastrophic business interruptions. We have experienced safety hazards on the streets when traffic lights cease to operate. We have experienced public transportation systems, such as subways, literally stop in their tracks. We have experienced the dangers of civil unrest. And we have even experienced a spike in the birthrate nine months after a blackout. Which makes me wonder: Just as there have been "blackout babies," could we also experience "Y2K babies" as well? This afternoon's hearing may not answer that question directly, but we will seek to: determine the business vulnerabilities, system risks, and safety issues presented by the Year 2000 computer problem on energy utilities; discuss the strategies being employed to avoid interruptions in the normal delivery of power to American homes and businesses; and, review the potential Year 2000 impact on the delivery and distribution of our nation's current electric supply grid and the contingency plans necessary should it fail. I would also like to use this hearing to puncture some of the common myths regarding energy utilities - like the misperception that the Year 2000 problem has the potential to cause a "China Syndrome" scenario for a nuclear power plant, and other fallacies that only serve to incite the public into hysteria. Today, I am very pleased that we have a very distinguished panel of witnesses before us. I would like to welcome: Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., the Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Programs of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Ms. Kathleen M. Hirning, Chief Information Officer of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Mr. John L. Laakso, Executive Director of the Texas Public Utilities Commission; Mr. Kenneth P. Cohn, Computer Services Manager of Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) of Washington, D.C.; and, Mr. Richard Cowles, an utilities Year 2000 expert and the creator of an Internet website on this issue. At the conclusion of this hearing, I want us to have answered, to the extent that we can, the role, if any, the Federal Government should play in reducing the risk associated with the Year 2000 problem, and how Year 2000 compliance can be coordinated through the myriad of regulatory bodies that control energy utilities. I look forward to examining these issues with our witnesses today and I now turn to the Ranking Member of the subcommittee, Mr. Barcia of Michigan, for his opening statement. house.gov

To: John Mansfield who wrote (375)	5/17/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: John Mansfield	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 618

[UTILITIES] Discussion on outages 'Tim May <tcmay@got.net> wrote in article <tcmay-1605981209250001@santacruz-x2-37.got.net>... > Conclusions: > > 1. Companies haven't even identified the fixes they need, though there are > already some signs of scrounging (reported here and to me in e-mail). > > 2. Even if they identified a need to replace X, Y, and Z devices, in > various quantities, there is little chance the chip companies even _could_ > make 10- or 20-year old designs in modern chip-making plants. > > 3. Or would want to, given limited resources (and their own Y2K problems). > > 4. But assuming all of the above can be ignored, it will take at least a > year and maybe two years to get these chips built. > > 5. It ain't gonna happen. > > --Tim May Exactly, so what _might have been fixed by a simple part subsitution may have be fixed by significant redesign to use current parts, all the more reason why adhering to their silly outage schedules is absurd. We're big boys, if they tell us we'll have some "service interruptions" from time to time while they really "work the problem", we can handle that. But to just let us run off the edge of the cliff is despicable. Harlan ___ Subject: Re: Orphan Chips and the Y2K Problem Date: 16 May 1998 17:50:28 EDT From: "Harlan Smith" <hwsmith.nowhere@cris.com> Organization: Paperless Newsgroups: comp.software.year-2000, comp.sys.intel, sci.engr.semiconductors References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4