SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CRUS, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Gardiner who wrote (5837)5/15/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: JOHN N.  Respond to of 8193
 
In announcing to wall street that they are buying back stock and then not following through they display to wall street that they are not trustworthy and do not follow through with what they say they are going to do. Hence, the low credibility that they have with wall street, the public, and the stockholders. I believe that this action is very irresponsible on the part of the management. It certainly is no favor to the stockholders.



To: David Gardiner who wrote (5837)5/15/1998 6:08:00 PM
From: Terrapin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8193
 
Interesting thought.

Then again, if the share buy back would increase Teo's stake then perhaps CRUS management would want to do that to activate the poison pill defense and thus nullify Teo's threat.

I've never taken accounting so you probably no more about this than I do. Has anyone here ever seen one of these defenses activate and what effect did it have on the small shareholders?

Thanks,
John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News