Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

At the same time as this post/letter lacks anything resembling an answer to any of the very relevant questions presented re Cashco, it sounds ominously like a threat.

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: JOE TURMAINE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

SJBN, my last post to Jan simply stated, >>Sorry Jan, but I think you are "irrelevant". << Thanks for putting the shoe on the other foot for a change. It also seems that SI has "loosened" their terms of use as the chicken brigade has gone unchecked to date. JOE

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

I have watched your verbal attacks for months on CASHCO, Rhonda and Tony. Blew it at the outset. I first posted here perhaps three weeks ago. I personally own 145,000 shares and have over $70,000 invested. Okay, I can see why you're worried. But don't kill the messenger. Hey, wow! You were an undergraduate psych major? Impressive! I took psych courses too! Since that make us both practically Sigmund Freud, let me pose a problem to you: why is it that of all the many people who've made negative posts about CSHK on this thread, you single ME out? Thank you for telling us about your income. This information is absolutely essential to the discussion we're having here. One last note: may I counsel, as I so often do, the "SI Spelling and Grammar Lab"?

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 5:42:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

<off-topic; I guess> You forgot one part: &#147I possess an undergraduate degree in Psychology from a major east coast university&#133I can only assume after reviewing your mental attacks that you are starving for personal attention&#133Having previously had counselled merntally ill people I hiughly suggest you seek psychologicaql counselling&#133I will be more than glad to continue to expose the unbalanced and mentally unbalanced and unstable woman you are&#133&#148 The part you forgot: The very first thing you would have learned in Psych school had you actually gone, is that re-inforcing this behaviour you observe, by giving it further undue attention, is the exact opposite method which is taught, prescribed and recommended in any Psych curriculum. Try again? You could make up a background in Nuclear Physics&#151that might be fun. <gg> -MrB

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 5:43:00 PM
From: Tom C	Respond to of 7491

Well, SJB Welcome to SI. I see from your profile that this is your first day on SI. If you cuffed up the entry fee so that you could post that message then maybe Brad owes Janice a T-shirt. Regards Tom ps: Maybe you can provide some answers.

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 9:06:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 7491

OFF TOPIC Dr. Dillweed: It is my pleasure to inform you that you have made a very serious mistake. Pronouncing someone mentally unbalanced when they are in fact sane is a sign of psychosis! A veiled threat to "expose" further misconceptions can only end in a very unpleasant situation for you. Should you wish to debate the subject of mental illness, I will be more than happy to oblige. I must in all honesty advise you that you surely will lose the debate and feel much worse afterwards, which will be fine with me. The debate does not belong on this thread, so go to the thread posted below if you want to get it on. I look forward to it! Let's rock and roll, dick! Subject 19502

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/15/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

My what an interesting day on the CSHK thread. I've pretty much read the thread without comment for a good while, but you, sir (or madame), have made a grand entrance that defies silence. >>My background includes over 30 years working as a consultant to the computer industry with a verifiable income of over $200,000 per year. From where I sit that's a pretty modest sum to be boasting about. Sure you don't want to tell us about your CD changer with the remote control, too? >>I have a Masters Degree from the Univ. of PA, and I possess an undergraduate degree in Psychology from a major east coast university. Yet you still haven't figured out that you don't have to preface each of your messages with "TO:" and "FROM:"? The UofPA Booster Club probably cringes with each new post. >>Having previously had counselled [merntally] ill people I [hiughly] suggest you seek [psychologicaql] counselling. You are a very sick and mentally unbalanced woman in my opinion that desires to only create chaos and do nothing constructive. Your spelling and grammar - I take it you skipped that part of the curriculum? I can also suggest you watch Robert Schuler of the Crystal Cathederal The Hour of Power. Is that on before or after World Federation of Wrestling?

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/16/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

Off Topic First my apologies to the members of this thread, for rudely intruding, however I could not help myself, besides it is a weekend and I hope some tolerance will benefit me. Now to the subject at hand: Re: SJB In doing my weekly review of various threads, including the Morons thread, I saw your nomination. What intrigued me was the fact that you managed to make this "honorary" degree in your first day as poster of this illustrious and infamous SI board. Congratulations Sire!, it must be quite an achievement. So, I decided to "research" you. I must admit that you deserve the nomination and more. Reading your posts, and some of the responses made to the same, it is extraordinary that characters like you actually do exists, and they are not only the product of the mind of a drugged Hollywood film maker. Since a lot has already being said in the responses to your posts, including, but not limited to, your spelling prowess, (in spite of your so-called "education"), I simply would like to add in reference to your Bible pushing that you have been making here and there in you posts, the following, choice thoughts. Unfortunately they are not my words, but those of Mr. Henry Louis Mencken, a favorite of mine, and worry not, I do not hide behind Mr. Mencken, I believe every word he says on the subject, he just deserves the credit, since he said it first. So Mr. SJB, with no further delay, here it is, enjoy it, as it is for you: "Theology is the effort to explain the unknowable in terms of the not worth knowing." "Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable." "The Christian church, in its attitude toward science, shows the mind of a more or less enlightened man of the Thirteenth Century. It no longer believes that the earth is flat, but it is still convinced that prayer can cure after medicine fails." Psychotherapy: "The theory that the patient will probably get well anyhow, and is certainly a damned fool." And Finally, I believe he said this thinking about you.... "Nature abhors a moron." Have a nice weekend. Z.

To: SJB who wrote (2294)	5/17/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

OFF TOPIC Good morning SJB! You are now comfortable in your new digs at the Jill Jail as we call it here in this little corner of cyberspace. Better than the average jail, don't you agree? I have good news and bad news. The bad news is that your personal concept of "free speech" appears to have a few *kinks* if you will pardon the pun. The good news is that I don't think you have been permanently disbarred (sorry, couldn't help it) and you should be allowed back onto SI, IMHO. Remember several people tried to warn you, so when you get back on, keep the personal attacks ["flaming" is the lingo here] on the "Coffee Shop" threads such as #reply-4482988 or #reply-4486376 (left mouse click on those and you will be transported just like in Star Trek). I can't offer any advice about how to answer questions other than you should have a "spelling-check" feature on your computer and it helps if you use it. The other good news is that assuming you are allowed back on SI, you have set a new land speed record for qualification here: #Subject-19617 so hearty congratulations are in order! Hear hear!! I know I speak for myself when I say that I hold no grudges against you for calling me out and then running backwards at mach 1. Once you have done your time, you are allowed to start as fresh and as new as a baby. (Maybe a twisted baby, but hey, who isn't?) Am I right? You know I am! So get off that e-mail to the SI Overlord and ask for humble forgiveness and we all miss you very much and wish you well and hope to see you back here soon! And I hope you got some trim last night, that always helps calm one down, oui? P.S. Try not to get so serious, you spell badly when you are serious. BAWK!!:>