Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (17034)	5/15/1998 8:51:00 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, some shorts may come and go ... but once I arrive, I stay ... kind of like an unwanted house guest<g>! I'm glad you're open to "pro and con arguments" ... me too. I'll be gone for a while ... Best Regards to All, Bill

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (17034)	5/16/1998 5:44:00 AM
From: threadneedler	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl: Masterfully put: If shorts and/or those who have no position in TAVA insist on continued negative postings, just let them post in a vacuum. Most of their comments are not worth responding to anyway. Feeding off of those who defend TAVA, simply gives them more reason to post. I am very uncomfortable with the suggestion that Doc Stone is using this thread to further his own so-called 'stock picking' agenda. This not only goes against the spirit of this board, but also tells me all I need to know about his agenda. Keep doing your Joan of Arc thing, I'll keep an extinguisher handy. Karl: Thanks for the institutional info. For a stock that holds such promise, 12 is a very small number. You sound like you might have Ohio roots. Hey, if you can survive Eldon Miller & Earle Bruce, Doc Stone should be a piece of cake. One final word about Doc-like postings. Again, its not that nobody wants to hear anything bad about TAVA. We need reasoned & educated opinions on both sides of the spectrum. It's just when the negatives are relentlessly repeated & are cloaked in an obvious agenda that we get a bit piqued and suspicious. Remember, leave the shorts & agenda types in their own vacuous vacuum.