SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (32709)5/16/1998 1:34:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571399
 
Yousef, <Hope this helps> Ouch, thank you very much.
But some numbers in support of your "better price"
theory would be much more convincing than your
abstracted blurb. In particular, I find it very
hard to believe that Fab25 equipment is underutilized
these days ...



To: Yousef who wrote (32709)5/16/1998 3:43:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571399
 
Yousef, <better deal on automobile prices, Hertz rental or you (Ali the technical genius)>
I didn't realize that Hertz has discounts on Lexuses and BMWs:)
Next time I will try to shop around Hertz for a convertible...
BTW, I really disliked students with a slow learning curve like
yours. I wonder how did you manage to get your Ph.D
if you still discern no difference between
"FET architecture" and "CPU architecture"?



To: Yousef who wrote (32709)5/18/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571399
 
Yousef, re:<Intel has been much better at fully utilizing their capacity>

With five or six fabs, Intel should have capacity of 25,000 to 30,000 wafers per week (AMD's Fab 25, when fully utilized = 5K wafer/week capacity). So if Intel is getting 160 good die per wafer like Paul Engel says they are, they should be producing and selling 4 million to 4.8 million CPU's per week, or 200 to 240 million per year! Somethings fishy, wouldn't you say?

Petz