To: Gordon B. Taplin who wrote (6547 ) 5/16/1998 9:34:00 AM From: RocketMan Respond to of 50264
I don't know, but according to Roger Templeton, "Digitcom should not suffer ill effects as a result of the Indonesian people's political adjustment to the rationalization of their economy. Digitcom's recent agreement to purchase an Indonesian telephone company with assured revenues from PT Telekom vests our interests in basic infrastructure, with a secure income from a source that must be counted as among the most stable in the nation." (my emphasis) Now, add to this the following facts: -- the 50M Indonesian contract ensures a 10-year revenue stream, and the political upheaval is expected to last weeks, or months at the most. -- the stock DID NOT RUN UP from that Indonesian contract announcement. We added 50 cents, and gave more than that back. So our price level STILL refelcts ONLY last year's positive revenues and the international presence we are establishing in many other countries: Australia, VIetnam, Phillipines, European countries, Russia, Mordovia, the Middle East. I think the big money is still awaiting the SB-10 due in two weeks. -- International telcoms establish presences in dozens to over 100 countries. At any one time one or more of these are undergoing upheavals. That is the nature of international investing. -- Digitcom is NOT an international company, it is a US company with INTERNATIONAL business. -- Companies with assets in Indonesia would be affected much more than digitcom. IBM with computers there, GoodYear with tire plants, or whatever. We are investing in comm infrastructure, which is much more secure. Ever try to disrupt an undersea cable? Or a satellite link? Remember during Desert Storm when Iraq was being pounded and yet we could sit in front of our TV and watch everything going on? THat's becuase it is very difficult to take out a complex comm network. People will always communicate, especially during crises. Otherwise they would have to go live in caves. Heck, the biggest money maker from this current upheaval might be CNN sending back pictures. I wonder if any of that traffic is going through digitcom gateways? I am not trying to downplay the problems in Indonesia. However since the news always play up the negative, I am only trying to point out that the glass is much more than half full -- hell it is just about all full IMHO. Here are some selected excerpts from a story in this morning's Washingtom Post that has positive comments. It is easy to gloss over these when you read a bunch of negative stuff: "Most companies contacted by a reporter said they were only temporarily suspending operations in Indonesia. None had plans to close down and get out for good. Despite its current problems, foreign corporations see tremendous growth potential in Indonesia, which is the world's fourth most populous country, with 200 million people and an enormous wealth of oil and other natural resources." "Most of the foreign companies we talk to are looking at this crisis as an opportunity," "Nobody doubts that Asia is a growth market in the next 20 to 30 years," a spokesman said. "With a change in government, the foreign companies we've been talking to feel they might be able to help shape the new business environment, especially in a country that is on its back," Broadfoot said. "Officials may be looking for ways to handle infrastructure investments, telecom," he said. "Before, companies were told: 'Get into bed with this guy and he'll get you your license.' But now maybe a new government would try to figure out how to reorganize the telecom industry to rebuild investor confidence." (remember what we were saying about Digitcom profiting from the deregulation of the telecom business?)