Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chirodoc who wrote (4640)	5/16/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: Kevin Trevillian	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8242

From the FAQ: Besides membership revenue, what other forms of revenue are PNLK developing? * On-site Advertising * Customer lead Fax Service * Lead development * Direct mail services * On-line digital printing I look forward to getting a breakdown as to what % these rev. sources might be compared to sign-up revs. When thinking about the large numbers of users there could be, any one of these could be a huge business in itself. This could be a monster.

To: chirodoc who wrote (4640)	5/16/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8242

You know, there is a major griping point about that piss-ant press release that seems to really stick in my craw: When they asked who owned the rest of the shares, they made a big deal out of the company saying that they were not required to release that information. I fail to see what difference it makes, but the folks in Colorado made it out to be sinister or something and I am sure that to a lot of small investors, that may have seemed like PNLK was trying to hide something. Well, the truth of the matter is that lists of shareholders can only be released for very specific "proper purposes". To be nosy about who owns stock in a company is far from a proper purpose. especially from someone who is trying to bash a company. As to the inference, let me draw an analogy: Lets say that you are on trial for a crime and decline to take the stand. If the prosecutor says that your silence is an indication of your wrongdoing, that is an automatic mis-trial. Well, that is exactly what happened here. PNLK was very proper in declining to release names of stockholders. To accuse them of wrongdoing because they did not so release is ludecrous, and for any of you who sold because of that ... THINK ABOUT IT! It was totally irrelevant and they should have never put it in their release. Their action shows their incompetence. As to performing, PNLK has done as they have promised, they have pulled together the resources onto their web site, they have offered for sale, they have, have, have ... you need to consider the bad faith attempt to manipulate the market on the part of the folks in Colorado ... BTW, the site to go to the SEC is www.sec.gov and their email is help@sec.gov just so that there was no misunderstanding, I copied the evil analyst in my email ...