SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond who wrote (7283)5/16/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Raymond - anyone that wants to is free to "clone" the MSFT OS. It's just not as easy as you might think. Backward compatibility, plug-and-pray, and all that.



To: Raymond who wrote (7283)5/16/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Can anyone explain why no other company can clone the MSFT OS?

Oh, it's been tried, e.g. Sun's WABI. But Windows isn't static, there's no way they can keep up, and they can't compete on price. It makes no economic sense.

It's completely different with CPUs, because the architectural feature set doesn't change, the implementation just gets more efficient. It's like being stuck with DOS 1.0 features forever and competing on who can squeeze the most bytes out of the executable.



To: Raymond who wrote (7283)5/16/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: Shane Stump  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Several reasons:

1) There is no money in it to be made.
2) Windows 9x/NT x are moving targets (constantly being developed).
3) Resources.

IBM tried to keep pace with OS/2 and finally threw in the towel. The government is going to attempt to punish Microsoft for its success.

Shane