To: thewiz who wrote (75 ) 5/17/1998 12:45:00 AM From: Adrian du Plessis Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 314
thewiz, I don't think Robert or anyone means to be insensitive to the plight of the small investor. That'd be blaming the victim. What I read Robert to say, and I fully agree, is that the concerns and problem areas at YBM should have been common knowledge to securities industry professionals - those characters getting paid the big bucks from sales commissions, or advising clients or managing mutual funds. It's their supposed due diligence on which the public relies. It's their names and reputations that lend legitimacy to junior stocks in the eyes of investors. That the job done by brokers, analysts, fund managers and advisors is, too often, so woefully inadequate is as much the story as is the failings of those public companies themselves. Lawsuits against brokerage firms et al one would think would be an incentive toward higher standards in the industry. It hasn't happened yet, though. Another thing - when you get stock deals that involve big institutional backers, the pension and mutual fund managers may not sue because that would raise questions as to why their own people failed to perform proper due diligence, or may have been in conflict of interest situations, or worse. So, the funds - playing with other peoples' money, that of many small investors - will just write it off as a bad experience and keep their mouths shut. Hopefully that'll change some day, too. Robert - as far as a book goes - I usually just go from one case to the next and don't look back. Once I understand a deal, I'm pretty well ready to move on - I doubt I'll be looking at YBM for too much longer. Others (around the world even) may well want to write a book - this is one amazing tale! It ranks right up there with the biggest scandals I've seen in the history of Canada's junior markets.