Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold's Six Month Base Near Completion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Byron who wrote (5)	5/17/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Bill Murphy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94

Perhaps you are right. If you are, we are dead wrong. There ought to be a substantial move up in the price of gold in the coming weeks and that will only be the beginning. Bill

To: Tom Byron who wrote (5)	5/17/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: C Hudson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 94

To Tom Byron- I believe that all cyclical analysis, no matter where it is derived, such as your 114 week XAU cycle or Astrology, etc. will not hold water as we approach 2000. Aspects of the year 2000 will have a DRAMAITC impact on EVEYTHING. Such as the Y2K problem and millenial fever. When people use cycles a broad notion is that all the events of the past sum up to give the present and possibly predict the future. The opposite will happen as we approach the year 2000. It will be the future date of 2000 that will come back in time to influence the present. Think about this psychologicaly too. Our mind set will change. We will begin to think forward to the year 2000 as opposed to thinking that the present is a summation of the past. It is a future date that will influence the present, not the past.